By Joe Cheung

Dec 16, 2020

This is sort of an appendix to my post about DeepMind protein structure prediction. Epistemic status: not too sure, just doing the back-of-the-envelope with more up-to-date numbers.

This is an update of Gwern’s cost-benefit analysis of Folding@home (FAH) which made the case that distributed computing is harmful as scientific lemon projects running at high resource cost.

  1. Charitable Supercomputer
  2. Sins of Commission
  3. Sins of Omission
  4. Benefits
  5. Charity Is Still Not About Helping

Charitable Supercomputer

FAH boasts of being the world’s first exaFLOP (1018 FLOPS) computer system when it achieved a processing speed of 1.22 exaFLOPS by late March 2020 and reached 2.43 exaFLOPS by April 12, 2020. As it is powered by volunteers running its clients on their CPUs and GPUs (and until 2012 their PS3s too), heightened interest during the COVID-19 pandemic has allowed it to be faster than the top 500 supercomputers combined.

*The exascale barrier is a quintillion (1,000,000,000,000,000,000) operations per second

Sins of Commission

How much electricity does FAH consume? When it hit 1.01 exaFLOPS, an estimated ~280,000 GPUs and 4.8 million CPU cores were participating. According to FAH, although power supplies on most computers are rated at 400 watts, a Pentium-type computer uses about 100 watts on average (if the monitor is off), so let’s assume each CPU and GPU draw 100 watts, not factoring in heat production, normal system load, nor dynamic frequency scaling. That gives 508,000,000 watts, and a power efficiency of 1.99 GFLOP (109 FLOP)/watt, putting it at 145th on the November Green500 List.

How much air pollution does FAH produce? Assuming 1.01 exaFLOPS is sustained for a whole year, it consumes 4.45 terawatt-hours per year. That means a greenhouse gas emission of 3,150,000 metric tons, as much as that from 680,000 cars. If we’re being generous and pretend that all the electricity is produced in the US, and take into account Gwern’s estimation of 7.7 deaths per year for a US power mix, it means 34 deaths per year due to air pollution from powering FAH.

Sins of Omission

How much does all that electricity cost? As of September 2020, the average US rate for 1 kilowatt-hour is $0.1355, so the electricity bill of FAH is $602,975,000 per year. Take the Against Malaria Foundation for example, GiveWell estimates that $2,300 can save a child’s life in the developing world. The opportunity cost of FAH is 262,163 dead children per year.


Has FAH actually accomplish anything? They boast of 233 papers produced in the 20 years since the start of the project, but their own summary doesn’t give the impression that they were too impressed, but who am I to judge. Folding@home, per its namesake, initially set out to simulate protein folding, but it seems that they are more about dynamics of the folding mechanism, than predicting anything. They have never competed in CASP.

Charity Is Still Not About Helping


“It is sad and pitiable that we spend so many billions on things like dog food and cosmetics rather than saving lives; but isn’t it even sadder that we can avoid that error, and try to do good, and still fail? The only thing sadder, I think, would be if we could know of our failure and go on supporting FAH. If charity truly was not about helping.”

↑ back to top

comments powered by Disqus